I'm sure every single one of you has seen the nude art discussion made by the HQ of deviantart. While i do not respect a lot of the community of deviantart, i must give credit where it is due, and i admit that there are some great brains behind the website in itself, even if their april fool's pranks have been lackluster and the site is broken a lot of the time.
But anyways, the nudes topic asked five questions, and i threw my comment into the mix. But before i let it wash out to sea without anyone noticing, i figured i might as well post my answers here.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Questions for the reader:
1. Do you think there is too much nude subject matter on deviantART or is it a non-issue for you? How much do you think your gender or sexual preferences might influence your answer?
2. When is censorship of art permissible? Where would you draw the line? What rational rule could you offer as a practical guideline?
3. Have you ever had a work of art you created censored or banned in any way?
4. If an artist really believes in what he or she has created, how should the artist respond to censorship of that art? Have you been made aware of an instance of "art suppression" via the Internet?
5. Would you ever suggest to another artist that he or she should tone a work of art down or agree to the censorship of an art object in a specific situation?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1: I do not believe there is too much nude art on deviantart, however i believe there is too much confusion and misinterpretation on what the nude art is supposed to represent, and as a result we get conflict
2: There is no place to draw the line for art. Art is everything and anything, art is meaningful and informational. If your picture includes gore, then who cares if it's tasteless, provided it send the message across. Is your model underage? Well there's no age limit for nude models, that exists solely for the porn industry. You can't put limits on art.
3: No, as i do not do nude other than life drawings. I have had people express slight disgust or discomfort at the idea of me, or anyone drawing a live nude person in front of them. The problem is that people view the body as so sexual lately that they fail to notice the beauty in the curves and muscles and forget what makes someone beautiful.
4: If an artist truly believes in his work, there should be no censorship. This is the artist's message to the world, and just because you disagree with the statement does not mean you have the write to hide it.
5: Never.
I think this is a really great topic to bring up, I've seen a lot of complaints about the amount of artistic nudes on the front page and debate on whether or not it is pornography. Even the picture of the girl in the saddle could be interpreted artistically, or with a sexual statement without being pornography. The problem is that a lot of people don't understand the difference between porn and art, and as such confuse it with being one and the same, while really you can have a sexual statement in your piece while still having full artistic principle behind it. We put so much shame and embarrassment into sex that when people throw the subject into the open it is met with hate and disdain, without anyone trying to understand why it was thrown out in the first place.
I feel like we as a human race have been ignoring the beauty of the body for far too long.